Over at Signal vs. Noise, there’s a great debate about subway maps.
What’s the best way to draw a subway map? The one on the left is the official and geographically accurate version. The one on the right is less geographically accurate, but easier to read and understand.
At least, that’s what some people say. Scott, what do you think? (Feel free to comment over there.)
Jon,
Having used the NYC subway several times, I do see some benefit in the new map design. Of course, it does almost imply that those lines all actually exist at first glance. The best thing about the new design is that it represents the express lines so much better than the original map. Maybe I’m not a good person to ask as I understand the system. Perhaps someone who hasn’t traveled the trains in NYC should use both and report back.
Jeff
Though I’ve had may share of missed stops and wrong trains over the years, over all the maps were pretty easy to understand. Even Emmett is able to read one, for the most part. The most challenging thing about the old one (still official, btw) has always been the express/local distinction. The new map seems to make that much clearer. But on the flip side, I’ve often counted on the maps geographical accuracy, which helps me time my trip better. For instance, though the London Tube map looks great and is easy to read, it’s very hard to determine how far you’re really going.
Bottom line, it’s great to see an alternative. It should be widely circulated for a period of time to see if it really works.